Talk:Chris Killah: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
New page: I object, loudly and irately, to Interrobang breaking the associated characters out into their own page. They are associated characters because they have ''no'' meaning outside of Chris Ki... |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I object, loudly and irately, to Interrobang breaking the associated characters out into their own page. | I object, loudly and irately, to Interrobang breaking the associated characters out into their own page. | ||
They are associated characters because they have ''no'' meaning outside of Chris Killah's context. That's why they're ''called'' "associated characters." -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 03:05, 23 August 2009 (EDT) | They are associated characters because they have ''no'' meaning outside of Chris Killah's context. That's why they're ''called'' "associated characters." -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 03:05, 23 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:I object to your objection because I'd much rather have them on their own pages, since they have individual names. If they were utterly nameless and given only generic descriptors, sure. But they're not. We have (small) pages for other characters whose only context is in reference to other characters. What makes this any different? --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 03:14, 23 August 2009 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 07:14, 23 August 2009
I object, loudly and irately, to Interrobang breaking the associated characters out into their own page. They are associated characters because they have no meaning outside of Chris Killah's context. That's why they're called "associated characters." -Derik 03:05, 23 August 2009 (EDT)
- I object to your objection because I'd much rather have them on their own pages, since they have individual names. If they were utterly nameless and given only generic descriptors, sure. But they're not. We have (small) pages for other characters whose only context is in reference to other characters. What makes this any different? --M Sipher 03:14, 23 August 2009 (EDT)
