Talk:Stun: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
New page: So... is this supposed to be a "Stun" or a "STUN"? I've seen both on YoJoe. Though I can't find what "STUN" would be an acronym for... --~~~~ |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
So... is this supposed to be a "Stun" or a "STUN"? I've seen both on YoJoe. Though I can't find what "STUN" would be an acronym for... --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 22:34, 9 October 2009 (EDT) | So... is this supposed to be a "Stun" or a "STUN"? I've seen both on YoJoe. Though I can't find what "STUN" would be an acronym for... --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 22:34, 9 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
:I generally called it a STUN (probably picked it up from someone else... I'm not a fan of the vehicle), but a quick looksee on Yojoe reveals no acronym like the HISS (HIgh Speed Sentry), the HAL (Heavy Artillery Laser) or the VAMP (Vehicle: Attack and Multi-Purpose), so no, it's not acronymed and should just be Stun. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 23:41, 9 October 2009 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 03:41, 10 October 2009
So... is this supposed to be a "Stun" or a "STUN"? I've seen both on YoJoe. Though I can't find what "STUN" would be an acronym for... --M Sipher 22:34, 9 October 2009 (EDT)
- I generally called it a STUN (probably picked it up from someone else... I'm not a fan of the vehicle), but a quick looksee on Yojoe reveals no acronym like the HISS (HIgh Speed Sentry), the HAL (Heavy Artillery Laser) or the VAMP (Vehicle: Attack and Multi-Purpose), so no, it's not acronymed and should just be Stun. --Detour 23:41, 9 October 2009 (EDT)
