File talk:Razorclawtfu.jpg: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I liked the old image better. It wasn't quite as lost in a sea of detail-obscuring black and Dreamwave-ish proportions. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 01:43, 6 December 2009 (EST) | I liked the old image better. It wasn't quite as lost in a sea of detail-obscuring black and Dreamwave-ish proportions. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 01:43, 6 December 2009 (EST) | ||
: Yeah, but he's behind two guys. Plus, the new one's a nice fiction-neutral image. If we have images of dudes that aren't cropped out of covers or panels, we should use them unless the alternative conveys important information. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 01:53, 6 December 2009 (EST) | : Yeah, but he's behind two guys. Plus, the new one's a nice fiction-neutral image. If we have images of dudes that aren't cropped out of covers or panels, we should use them unless the alternative conveys important information. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 01:53, 6 December 2009 (EST) | ||
::I agree with Detour. The old version conveys important information such as what he looks like. -- [[User:Repowers|Repowers]] 02:14, 6 December 2009 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 07:14, 6 December 2009
I liked the old image better. It wasn't quite as lost in a sea of detail-obscuring black and Dreamwave-ish proportions. --Detour 01:43, 6 December 2009 (EST)
- Yeah, but he's behind two guys. Plus, the new one's a nice fiction-neutral image. If we have images of dudes that aren't cropped out of covers or panels, we should use them unless the alternative conveys important information. --ItsWalky 01:53, 6 December 2009 (EST)
- I agree with Detour. The old version conveys important information such as what he looks like. -- Repowers 02:14, 6 December 2009 (EST)
