File talk:Razorclawtfu.jpg: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: Yeah, but he's behind two guys. Plus, the new one's a nice fiction-neutral image. If we have images of dudes that aren't cropped out of covers or panels, we should use them unless the alternative conveys important information. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 01:53, 6 December 2009 (EST) | : Yeah, but he's behind two guys. Plus, the new one's a nice fiction-neutral image. If we have images of dudes that aren't cropped out of covers or panels, we should use them unless the alternative conveys important information. --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 01:53, 6 December 2009 (EST) | ||
::I agree with Detour. The old version conveys important information such as what he looks like. -- [[User:Repowers|Repowers]] 02:14, 6 December 2009 (EST) | ::I agree with Detour. The old version conveys important information such as what he looks like. -- [[User:Repowers|Repowers]] 02:14, 6 December 2009 (EST) | ||
:::Add a third vote for the old one. I could barely make out any details on the new one. [[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] | |||
Revision as of 07:42, 6 December 2009
I liked the old image better. It wasn't quite as lost in a sea of detail-obscuring black and Dreamwave-ish proportions. --Detour 01:43, 6 December 2009 (EST)
- Yeah, but he's behind two guys. Plus, the new one's a nice fiction-neutral image. If we have images of dudes that aren't cropped out of covers or panels, we should use them unless the alternative conveys important information. --ItsWalky 01:53, 6 December 2009 (EST)
