Talk:Inhumanoids: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Rosicrucian (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't recall them being mentioned by name...--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 19:13, 8 December 2009 (EST) | Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't recall them being mentioned by name...--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 19:13, 8 December 2009 (EST) | ||
:I think we should treat it the same way we did [[My Little Pony]]. They aren't named in-fiction, but let's not be dense that it's them. '''--Spengs (at work, can't log in)''' | :I think we should treat it the same way we did [[My Little Pony]]. They aren't named in-fiction, but let's not be dense that it's them. '''--Spengs (at work, can't log in)''' | ||
::Oh, I agree that it's them. I mean, you know it's them, I know it's them, Troop has come out and ''said'' that it's them, but we're left with much the same situation with the [[Narliphant]].--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 20:08, 8 December 2009 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 01:08, 9 December 2009
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't recall them being mentioned by name...--RosicrucianTalk 19:13, 8 December 2009 (EST)
- I think we should treat it the same way we did My Little Pony. They aren't named in-fiction, but let's not be dense that it's them. --Spengs (at work, can't log in)
- Oh, I agree that it's them. I mean, you know it's them, I know it's them, Troop has come out and said that it's them, but we're left with much the same situation with the Narliphant.--RosicrucianTalk 20:08, 8 December 2009 (EST)
