Talk:Optimus Prime's rescuees: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Geewunling (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Tigerpaw28 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:::So, are we good to go on the move? [[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] 16:14, 27 January 2010 (EST) | :::So, are we good to go on the move? [[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] 16:14, 27 January 2010 (EST) | ||
::::I'd say "yes", but I'd like to know if that means the baove two examples should be moved as well (or at least the latter). [[User:Geewunling|Geewunling]] 00:44, 28 January 2010 (EST) | ::::I'd say "yes", but I'd like to know if that means the baove two examples should be moved as well (or at least the latter). [[User:Geewunling|Geewunling]] 00:44, 28 January 2010 (EST) | ||
:::::Zamojin Empress can stay as it's referring to the title of Zamojin Empress and not the individuals who held it. Maccadam's bartender on the other hand, should probably be moved. --[[User:Tigerpaw28|Tigerpaw28]] 01:20, 28 January 2010 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 06:20, 28 January 2010
Single or plural
I know article titles are usually singular (Aerialbot vs Aerialbots), but this article just doesn't feel right at the singular title. Maybe because it's actually about 2 individuals and not an actual group? Anyone else agree? Khajidha 16:49, 26 January 2010 (EST)
- I was actually going to make it plural until I remembered we had a rule about keeping things singular. I decided to go with that, in the same vein as Zamojin Empress and Maccadam's bartender. But somehow it does kinda feel off to me in this case. Geewunling 01:25, 27 January 2010 (EST)
- "Aerialbot" is as such because it's about a type of Transformer. This article is about two specific characters, so it should be at the plural. —Interrobang 01:44, 27 January 2010 (EST)
- So, are we good to go on the move? Khajidha 16:14, 27 January 2010 (EST)
- I'd say "yes", but I'd like to know if that means the baove two examples should be moved as well (or at least the latter). Geewunling 00:44, 28 January 2010 (EST)
- Zamojin Empress can stay as it's referring to the title of Zamojin Empress and not the individuals who held it. Maccadam's bartender on the other hand, should probably be moved. --Tigerpaw28 01:20, 28 January 2010 (EST)
- I'd say "yes", but I'd like to know if that means the baove two examples should be moved as well (or at least the latter). Geewunling 00:44, 28 January 2010 (EST)
- So, are we good to go on the move? Khajidha 16:14, 27 January 2010 (EST)
- "Aerialbot" is as such because it's about a type of Transformer. This article is about two specific characters, so it should be at the plural. —Interrobang 01:44, 27 January 2010 (EST)
