Talk:Beast mode: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
→Movie: new section |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Surely an image of actual confirmed beast modes, rather than a gratuitous fanwank that is far more likely to be just a bunch of animals, would be more appropriate? [[User:Eire]] 21.54 Nov 5 09 (UTC) | Surely an image of actual confirmed beast modes, rather than a gratuitous fanwank that is far more likely to be just a bunch of animals, would be more appropriate? [[User:Eire]] 21.54 Nov 5 09 (UTC) | ||
:I agree. That's also what it says in the "picsneeded" box. - [[User:Starfield|Starfield]] 16:56, 5 November 2009 (EST) | :I agree. That's also what it says in the "picsneeded" box. - [[User:Starfield|Starfield]] 16:56, 5 November 2009 (EST) | ||
== Movie == | |||
Should Scorponok and Ravage be included here, 'cause their pages describe their alt modes as beast modes. [[Special:Contributions/96.61.43.230|96.61.43.230]] 09:26, 30 January 2010 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 14:26, 30 January 2010
Why was the redirect to alternate mode deleted? That is where beast modes are discussed. - Starfield 22:46, 6 May 2009 (EDT)
Main Image
Surely an image of actual confirmed beast modes, rather than a gratuitous fanwank that is far more likely to be just a bunch of animals, would be more appropriate? User:Eire 21.54 Nov 5 09 (UTC)
- I agree. That's also what it says in the "picsneeded" box. - Starfield 16:56, 5 November 2009 (EST)
Movie
Should Scorponok and Ravage be included here, 'cause their pages describe their alt modes as beast modes. 96.61.43.230 09:26, 30 January 2010 (EST)
