Talk:Multiversal singularity

Multiversal hand-wringing.

Personally, I think we may be spazzing out a bit too much about supposed "inconsistencies" in the Multiversal Singularities theory. It's getting to the point where we're editorializing about it in articles, and that I think is the time where we ought to step back and take a deep breath. Being a multiversal singularity obviously doesn't mean that the same events have to occur in every universe, nor that what happens in one universe to a singularity has to affect their presence in all other universes. Certainly Omega Terminus is highly divergent from Vector Sigma, even though it's a singularity. Certainly Primus has been devoured by Unicron in some universes, while he persists in others. So all the hand-wringing over whether The Fallen will wreck this seems a bit overblown to me, and certainly gets a bit too speculative to be included in the articles themselves..--Rosicrucian^Talk 14:03, 14 April 2009 (EDT)

Now that Hasbro's given an answer

Is it okay to put up some fanwank-y analysis anywhere on this wiki (outside of articles), like on this talk page or my user page? Item42 12:46, 15 March 2010 (EDT)

What? --ItsWalky 13:06, 15 March 2010 (EDT)

What I mean is, if some user (like me) can put up some analysis on what this answer meant and what it (along with other related stuff) means and implies, in both real-world and in-story context. I don't think one should put something like that in an article since it is just analysis and speculation. Like a lot of the stuff on Talk:Sari Sumdac. Item42 04:00, 16 March 2010 (EDT)

No. Get a blog or go to a forum. —Interrobang 04:27, 16 March 2010 (EDT)