Talk:Side Burn (RID): Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
::The website it was actually posted on is lost to teh interwebs, but the [http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.toys.transformers/browse_frm/thread/6b06340117d884cf/9df5aed3c56e0de4?hl=en&lnk=st&q=+interview+designer+speedbreaker ATT discussion on the topic] is not. - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] 22:02, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
::The website it was actually posted on is lost to teh interwebs, but the [http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.toys.transformers/browse_frm/thread/6b06340117d884cf/9df5aed3c56e0de4?hl=en&lnk=st&q=+interview+designer+speedbreaker ATT discussion on the topic] is not. - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] 22:02, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
:::Two years later, I do some digging and find [http://www.excite-webtl.jp/world/english/web/?wb_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.takarahobby.com%2Fkaihatsu%2F0312tranceformer%2Findex.html&wb_lp=JAEN&wb_dis=2 this]. It's translated (by Excite, of all things?) so there's a bunch of Engrish, but at least there's a link! [[User:Onslaught Six|Onslaught Six]] 09:33, 18 March 2010 (EDT)
:::Two years later, I do some digging and find [http://www.excite-webtl.jp/world/english/web/?wb_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.takarahobby.com%2Fkaihatsu%2F0312tranceformer%2Findex.html&wb_lp=JAEN&wb_dis=2 this]. It's translated (by Excite, of all things?) so there's a bunch of Engrish, but at least there's a link! [[User:Onslaught Six|Onslaught Six]] 09:33, 18 March 2010 (EDT)
::::And the [http://web.archive.org/web/20040211060932/http://www.toyboxex.com/phorum/read.php?f=3&i=178&t=178 original forum post] linked in the ATT discussion (via Archive.org). [[User:Onslaught Six|Onslaught Six]] 09:36, 18 March 2010 (EDT)
::::And the [http://web.archive.org/web/20040211060932/http://www.toyboxex.com/phorum/read.php?f=3&i=178&t=178 original forum post] linked in the ATT discussion (via Archive.org). [[User:Onslaught Six|Onslaught Six]] 09:38, 18 March 2010 (EDT)


==Shattered Glass?==
==Shattered Glass?==

Revision as of 13:38, 18 March 2010

Should this be Side Burn (RiD)? -Derik 02:38, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

No. All RID pages with tags use "(RID)", or, at least thew should. --FortMax 02:47, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Apology

I'd swear I read somewhere that the dude who designed Side Burn gave an interview where he apologized for making the transformation so godawful ridiculous. Anyone else remember this? -hx 21:24, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

No, I remember this too. The same guy designed Armada Red Alert. --M Sipher 21:39, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
The website it was actually posted on is lost to teh interwebs, but the ATT discussion on the topic is not. - Chris McFeely 22:02, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Two years later, I do some digging and find this. It's translated (by Excite, of all things?) so there's a bunch of Engrish, but at least there's a link! Onslaught Six 09:33, 18 March 2010 (EDT)
And the original forum post linked in the ATT discussion (via Archive.org). Onslaught Six 09:38, 18 March 2010 (EDT)

Shattered Glass?

Why is the SG Side Burn listed here? I get that there's obviously something mysterious about the guy, but isn't saying SG Side Burn IS RiD Side Burn arriving in this dimension after the Unicron Singularity a bit of a stretch without, you know, proof? --Xaaron 13:52, 1 January 2010 (EST)

We do have one of the SG authors as an active editor, so I've always been willing to assume that our reasoning is thus either correct or the matter's supposed to be intentionally ambiguous (in which case we might as well go with an explanation that fits the tendency for the FunPub continuity to be all interconnected). --Jeysie 17:00, 4 January 2010 (EST)
Or I'm being a bastard. --M Sipher 18:46, 4 January 2010 (EST)
I figured that possibility was covered by "intentionally ambigious". --Jeysie 19:09, 4 January 2010 (EST)