Talk:Rung (G1): Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
New page: Hey, I've been rereading Eugenesis, and Rung is referenced by Soundwave in it as a psychologist. I was wondering what our policy is for a case like this, where a character originates in w... |
Jimsorenson (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hey, I've been rereading Eugenesis, and Rung is referenced by Soundwave in it as a psychologist. I was wondering what our policy is for a case like this, where a character originates in what is technically fanfiction and then graduates to official canon. Does this merit a mention? --[[User:Nu-Priest|Nu-Priest]] 11:56, 31 May 2010 (EDT) | Hey, I've been rereading Eugenesis, and Rung is referenced by Soundwave in it as a psychologist. I was wondering what our policy is for a case like this, where a character originates in what is technically fanfiction and then graduates to official canon. Does this merit a mention? --[[User:Nu-Priest|Nu-Priest]] 11:56, 31 May 2010 (EDT) | ||
:There is this: [[Fandom#Adopted_fan_terminology]]. However, I don't think that's exactly the case here, more like an author canonizing his own work. Maybe a trivia note on this page.--[[User:Jimsorenson|Jimsorenson]] 12:00, 31 May 2010 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 16:00, 31 May 2010
Hey, I've been rereading Eugenesis, and Rung is referenced by Soundwave in it as a psychologist. I was wondering what our policy is for a case like this, where a character originates in what is technically fanfiction and then graduates to official canon. Does this merit a mention? --Nu-Priest 11:56, 31 May 2010 (EDT)
- There is this: Fandom#Adopted_fan_terminology. However, I don't think that's exactly the case here, more like an author canonizing his own work. Maybe a trivia note on this page.--Jimsorenson 12:00, 31 May 2010 (EDT)
