Talk:Multiverse: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Rosicrucian (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
''(Also, my sandbox at [[User:Item42/sandbox/Multiverse]] is still up since there is '''a lot''' of information to transfer from there.)'' [[User:Item42|Item42]] 00:24, 3 July 2010 (EDT) | ''(Also, my sandbox at [[User:Item42/sandbox/Multiverse]] is still up since there is '''a lot''' of information to transfer from there.)'' [[User:Item42|Item42]] 00:24, 3 July 2010 (EDT) | ||
:I disagree, based on my notes on [[Talk:Omniverse#Replace with a .22Multiverse.22_article|Talk:Omniverse]] regards what I'd like to see in a Multiverse article. A fiction section involving plot points that directly involve the multiversal concept seem entirely appropriate. Especially since it and related articles like [[multiversal singularity]] are not very well-documented in terms of where some of this stuff even comes from source-wise. --[[User:Jeysie|Jeysie]] 00:35, 3 July 2010 (EDT) | :I disagree, based on my notes on [[Talk:Omniverse#Replace with a .22Multiverse.22_article|Talk:Omniverse]] regards what I'd like to see in a Multiverse article. A fiction section involving plot points that directly involve the multiversal concept seem entirely appropriate. Especially since it and related articles like [[multiversal singularity]] are not very well-documented in terms of where some of this stuff even comes from source-wise. --[[User:Jeysie|Jeysie]] 00:35, 3 July 2010 (EDT) | ||
::In particular, I'd say Ramjet's musings on the nature of the Multiverse and how the Unicron Singularity was affecting it in Balancing Act belong here.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 00:39, 3 July 2010 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 04:39, 3 July 2010
Fiction
I don't think there needs to be a fiction section, since this is a general concept (like spark) and not a specific plot device or character. since the multiverse is everything, a fiction section would be ineffective. The article should just explain what it is and what it's not. Maybe have sections on "Establishment in fiction", "size and contents", "Known Properties" "Dimensional-hopping" and whatnot.
(Also, my sandbox at User:Item42/sandbox/Multiverse is still up since there is a lot of information to transfer from there.) Item42 00:24, 3 July 2010 (EDT)
- I disagree, based on my notes on Talk:Omniverse regards what I'd like to see in a Multiverse article. A fiction section involving plot points that directly involve the multiversal concept seem entirely appropriate. Especially since it and related articles like multiversal singularity are not very well-documented in terms of where some of this stuff even comes from source-wise. --Jeysie 00:35, 3 July 2010 (EDT)
- In particular, I'd say Ramjet's musings on the nature of the Multiverse and how the Unicron Singularity was affecting it in Balancing Act belong here.--RosicrucianTalk 00:39, 3 July 2010 (EDT)
