MediaWiki talk:Milestones: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Kind of interesting to see that even through all the new series and everything, we seem to average something like 1000 articles every six months, just eyeballing it. --[[User:Jeysie|Jeysie]] 00:51, 3 July 2010 (EDT) | Kind of interesting to see that even through all the new series and everything, we seem to average something like 1000 articles every six months, just eyeballing it. --[[User:Jeysie|Jeysie]] 00:51, 3 July 2010 (EDT) | ||
==Mainpage link?== | |||
Shouldn't we link to this from the mainpage somewhere? I dunno, it seems like we oughtta. Somewhere. --[[User:M Sipher|M Sipher]] 00:56, 3 July 2010 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 04:56, 3 July 2010
Okay, all the milestone articles now link back here as a hub page for easy navigation. Is there any way for us to know for certain what the seven thousandth article was?--RosicrucianTalk 01:43, 17 December 2009 (EST)
- IIRC, the problem is that it is simply lost, as it took place in the time period that got wiped from the database. --Jeysie 03:48, 17 December 2009 (EST)
On a related note, has anything been done about the 75 extra pages due to diacritical marks? Khajidha 03:34, 17 December 2009 (EST)
- IIRC (heh), Abates has a way to deal with it, but he needs access to the database for it, and every time he's asked, nobody who can grant that access has responded. --Jeysie 03:48, 17 December 2009 (EST)
- I did send the fix directly to McFly a while back, and last I heard (about 5 months or so back) he was talking about putting it in when he and Scout upgraded Mediawiki. That's all I know at this point. --abates 04:31, 17 December 2009 (EST)
Kind of interesting to see that even through all the new series and everything, we seem to average something like 1000 articles every six months, just eyeballing it. --Jeysie 00:51, 3 July 2010 (EDT)
Mainpage link?
Shouldn't we link to this from the mainpage somewhere? I dunno, it seems like we oughtta. Somewhere. --M Sipher 00:56, 3 July 2010 (EDT)
