Talk:Doctor: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:::::::So why is it [[Tomahawk (G.I. Joe)]] and not [[Tomahawk (G1)]]? --[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] 16:59, 2 September 2010 (EDT) | :::::::So why is it [[Tomahawk (G.I. Joe)]] and not [[Tomahawk (G1)]]? --[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] 16:59, 2 September 2010 (EDT) | ||
::::::::Because the guy who moved that page didn't do it right. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 17:02, 2 September 2010 (EDT) | ::::::::Because the guy who moved that page didn't do it right. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 17:02, 2 September 2010 (EDT) | ||
::::::::Also, G.I. Joe is a thing documented to exist within Transformers. --[[Special:Contributions/71.234.192.28|71.234.192.28]] 18:07, 2 September 2010 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 22:07, 2 September 2010
I demand this be moved to "Doctor (Who)" --FortMax 20:25, 8 October 2009 (EDT)
-Second ShiningBlitz 12:56, 6 January 2010 (EST)
-Third --Kaymac192 14:55, 2 September 2010 (EDT)
-Works for me. External properties shouldn't get disambiguated by the TF franchise they crossover with. --Khajidha 15:20, 2 September 2010 (EDT)
-I agree. This is inconsistent with our other external property pages and it's kinda ridiculous. And not in a good way. ---Blackout- 16:03, 2 September 2010 (EDT)
- This isn't a page about external properties, this is a page about the Doctor that's mentionned in pages of a Generation 1 comic. --Detour 16:14, 2 September 2010 (EDT)
- Said Doctor being an external property. Or has Hasbro bought the BBC?--Khajidha 16:29, 2 September 2010 (EDT)
- I think the point is (Who) as a disambiguation, cute though that may be, has no basis in Transformers. --71.234.192.28 16:31, 2 September 2010 (EDT)
- I can see the logic of your point entirely and I'm completely in agreement with you...but as a Who fanboy, I'd love it if we made an exception :) --Emvee 16:37, 2 September 2010 (EDT)
- I just think that franchise disambiguations should be reserved for actual TF characters. For example, if a new G1 universe character called "the Doctor" it could not be called Doctor (G1). --Khajidha 16:52, 2 September 2010 (EDT)
- We do not do disambiguations based on hypothetical situations. —Interrobang 16:53, 2 September 2010 (EDT)
- So why is it Tomahawk (G.I. Joe) and not Tomahawk (G1)? --Khajidha 16:59, 2 September 2010 (EDT)
- Because the guy who moved that page didn't do it right. --Detour 17:02, 2 September 2010 (EDT)
- Also, G.I. Joe is a thing documented to exist within Transformers. --71.234.192.28 18:07, 2 September 2010 (EDT)
- So why is it Tomahawk (G.I. Joe) and not Tomahawk (G1)? --Khajidha 16:59, 2 September 2010 (EDT)
- We do not do disambiguations based on hypothetical situations. —Interrobang 16:53, 2 September 2010 (EDT)
- I just think that franchise disambiguations should be reserved for actual TF characters. For example, if a new G1 universe character called "the Doctor" it could not be called Doctor (G1). --Khajidha 16:52, 2 September 2010 (EDT)
- I can see the logic of your point entirely and I'm completely in agreement with you...but as a Who fanboy, I'd love it if we made an exception :) --Emvee 16:37, 2 September 2010 (EDT)
- I think the point is (Who) as a disambiguation, cute though that may be, has no basis in Transformers. --71.234.192.28 16:31, 2 September 2010 (EDT)
- Said Doctor being an external property. Or has Hasbro bought the BBC?--Khajidha 16:29, 2 September 2010 (EDT)

