Talk:Tremorcon: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
TX55 (talk | contribs)
New page: I think we can still let those character pages keep red because it is possible that those characters have their own actions someday. (Not sure if I've make my opinion clear.) --~~~~
 
Khajidha (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
I think we can still let those character pages keep red because it is possible that those characters have their own actions someday. (Not sure if I've make my opinion clear.) --'''[[User:TX55|<span style= "color:#00FA9A">TX55</span>]]'''<small><SUP>''[[User talk:TX55|<span style= "color:#0000CD">TALK</span>]]''</SUP></small> 11:16, 23 September 2010 (EDT)
I think we can still let those character pages keep red because it is possible that those characters have their own actions someday. (Not sure if I've make my opinion clear.) --'''[[User:TX55|<span style= "color:#00FA9A">TX55</span>]]'''<small><SUP>''[[User talk:TX55|<span style= "color:#0000CD">TALK</span>]]''</SUP></small> 11:16, 23 September 2010 (EDT)
:I don't think it is necessary. Leaving the names as redirects holds their place in namespace. Making the names links without pages makes it seem like there is work to be done on those pages, but there really isn't unless and until other stories use the characters. --[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] 11:32, 23 September 2010 (EDT)

Revision as of 15:32, 23 September 2010

I think we can still let those character pages keep red because it is possible that those characters have their own actions someday. (Not sure if I've make my opinion clear.) --TX55TALK 11:16, 23 September 2010 (EDT)

I don't think it is necessary. Leaving the names as redirects holds their place in namespace. Making the names links without pages makes it seem like there is work to be done on those pages, but there really isn't unless and until other stories use the characters. --Khajidha 11:32, 23 September 2010 (EDT)