User talk:Peter Damian: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{welcome}}
{{bigquote|Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?|[[wikipedia:Juvenal|Juvenal]]}}
Apologies for not getting to this sooner but, welcome! And keep up the good work! --[[User:Tigerpaw28|Tigerpaw28]] 13:30, 7 March 2011 (EST)
 
:Thank you. --[[User:Peter Damian|Peter Damian]] 03:07, 8 March 2011 (EST)
==Blocked and insulted at the same time==


Dude, I knew who you were the second you started editing, because the very first things you did were to get pointlessly, disproportionately angry at someone, and to act like you were the self-appointed "wiki police" when you've never done anything to deserve that kind of consideration - everything you always did under your old username. I was content to not bring it up if you were going to act like a sensible, productive member of the community, but as all you seem to now be doing is making snide out-of-the-corner-of-your-mouth remarks about how you've "tricked" us - you didn't, and you're banned. - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] 13:01, 29 March 2011 (EDT)
Dude, I knew who you were the second you started editing, because the very first things you did were to get pointlessly, disproportionately angry at someone, and to act like you were the self-appointed "wiki police" when you've never done anything to deserve that kind of consideration - everything you always did under your old username. I was content to not bring it up if you were going to act like a sensible, productive member of the community, but as all you seem to now be doing is making snide out-of-the-corner-of-your-mouth remarks about how you've "tricked" us - you didn't, and you're banned. - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] 13:01, 29 March 2011 (EDT)
:"never done anything to deserve that kind of consideration"
:94 articles and over 2000 edits over a two-year period. I like to think that's something.
:Oh, but ''of course''! Once you disagree with the mob, it doesn't matter if you're a long-time editor or a troll! --[[User:Peter Damian|Peter Damian]] 13:13, 29 March 2011 (EDT)

Revision as of 17:13, 29 March 2011

“ Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? ”

—Juvenal

Blocked and insulted at the same time

Dude, I knew who you were the second you started editing, because the very first things you did were to get pointlessly, disproportionately angry at someone, and to act like you were the self-appointed "wiki police" when you've never done anything to deserve that kind of consideration - everything you always did under your old username. I was content to not bring it up if you were going to act like a sensible, productive member of the community, but as all you seem to now be doing is making snide out-of-the-corner-of-your-mouth remarks about how you've "tricked" us - you didn't, and you're banned. - Chris McFeely 13:01, 29 March 2011 (EDT)

"never done anything to deserve that kind of consideration"
94 articles and over 2000 edits over a two-year period. I like to think that's something.
Oh, but of course! Once you disagree with the mob, it doesn't matter if you're a long-time editor or a troll! --Peter Damian 13:13, 29 March 2011 (EDT)