Talk:Primus apotheosis: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
::The latter I don't agree with because I'm pretty sure one isn't considered a "wannabe Prime" if they're ''created from the Matrix itself''.  --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 16:08, 17 November 2011 (EST)
::The latter I don't agree with because I'm pretty sure one isn't considered a "wannabe Prime" if they're ''created from the Matrix itself''.  --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 16:08, 17 November 2011 (EST)
:::I thought this was about specifically emulating Optimus. Is it just "a Prime" instead?[[Special:Contributions/192.249.47.196|192.249.47.196]] 16:55, 17 November 2011 (EST)
:::I thought this was about specifically emulating Optimus. Is it just "a Prime" instead?[[Special:Contributions/192.249.47.196|192.249.47.196]] 16:55, 17 November 2011 (EST)
If a decepticon can have it, wouldn't Archforce suffer from it? ([[Special:Contributions/184.56.19.73|184.56.19.73]] 13:54, 10 December 2011 (EST))

Revision as of 18:54, 10 December 2011

Sooo...where does this description come from? Gearbox

Pyro's profile in Issue 5 of Last Stand of the Wreckers.--RosicrucianTalk 18:51, 6 June 2010 (EDT)

I really wanna add Overload to the list of possible sufferers. --Detour 14:08, 19 April 2011 (EDT)

Would Optimus Primal or Primal Prime count?192.249.47.196 16:04, 17 November 2011 (EST)
The latter I don't agree with because I'm pretty sure one isn't considered a "wannabe Prime" if they're created from the Matrix itself. --ItsWalky 16:08, 17 November 2011 (EST)
I thought this was about specifically emulating Optimus. Is it just "a Prime" instead?192.249.47.196 16:55, 17 November 2011 (EST)

If a decepticon can have it, wouldn't Archforce suffer from it? (184.56.19.73 13:54, 10 December 2011 (EST))