Talk:William Fowler: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:If you're asking whether it's in continuity with the cartoon, then no, that can't be assumed unless in some future episode Optimus brings up that time they worked with Batman. For the purposes of the Wiki, the advert is a [[micro-continuity]]. --[[User:Abates|abates]] 20:52, 20 May 2012 (EDT) | :If you're asking whether it's in continuity with the cartoon, then no, that can't be assumed unless in some future episode Optimus brings up that time they worked with Batman. For the purposes of the Wiki, the advert is a [[micro-continuity]]. --[[User:Abates|abates]] 20:52, 20 May 2012 (EDT) | ||
::Yes, that's exactly what I mean. Thanks. -- [[User:Anythingspossibleforapossible|Anythingspossibleforapossible]] 21:44, 20 May 2012 (EDT) | ::Yes, that's exactly what I mean. Thanks. -- [[User:Anythingspossibleforapossible|Anythingspossibleforapossible]] 21:44, 20 May 2012 (EDT) | ||
::That is... one interpretation. If the Hub didn't want me to take it as totally in-continuity, they shouldn't have used a totally in-continuity Agent Fowler. - [[User:Starfield|Starfield]] 22:06, 20 May 2012 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 02:06, 21 May 2012
Are commercials canon? It seems like a joke to label it as a legit occurrence. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible 19:47, 20 May 2012 (EDT)
- Everything is canon. - Starfield 20:15, 20 May 2012 (EDT)
- Define "Everything". -- Anythingspossibleforapossible 20:36, 20 May 2012 (EDT)
- Something that is published by an official source. --ItsWalky 20:41, 20 May 2012 (EDT)
- Define "Everything". -- Anythingspossibleforapossible 20:36, 20 May 2012 (EDT)
- If you're asking whether it's in continuity with the cartoon, then no, that can't be assumed unless in some future episode Optimus brings up that time they worked with Batman. For the purposes of the Wiki, the advert is a micro-continuity. --abates 20:52, 20 May 2012 (EDT)
- Yes, that's exactly what I mean. Thanks. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible 21:44, 20 May 2012 (EDT)
- That is... one interpretation. If the Hub didn't want me to take it as totally in-continuity, they shouldn't have used a totally in-continuity Agent Fowler. - Starfield 22:06, 20 May 2012 (EDT)
