User talk:AutobotKickshift: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
AutobotKickshift (talk | contribs)
54 edits
Carrion (talk | contribs)
926 edits
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
So even as a member I'm not allowed to contribute to previously written articles? even if, not in this case, the information is lacking or new information has been released? how is that fair?
So even as a member I'm not allowed to contribute to previously written articles? even if, not in this case, the information is lacking or new information has been released? how is that fair?
:All you've done is edit war on an image caption. How is that contributing new information?--[[User:Carrion|Carrion]] 19:56, 3 October 2012 (EDT)
:All you've done is edit war on an image caption. How is that contributing new information?--[[User:Carrion|Carrion]] 19:56, 3 October 2012 (EDT)
I thought maybe readers would enjoy a joke more if they could actually GET IT. where did the ice cream joke even come from?

Revision as of 23:57, 3 October 2012

"No doubt our wit is too slyly subtle for them to appreciate."
"No doubt our wit is too slyly subtle for them to appreciate."
"Apparently, some of your kind saw fit to decorate me while I was waiting."

If you haven't yet contributed anything, we'd really rather you didn't simply change jokes or add new ones without adding actual content. This also holds true for removing captions whole-hog or replacing them with "information" that really isn't.
Remember, we're meant to be informative first, funny second. Write an episode summary, check out the Most Wanted Pages list or the Stubs list.
For further information, see: Project:Captions

My Edit to Kup

My joke was better than "I don't even like ice cream!" That doesn't even make any sense when has Kup EVER had any conversation about ice cream? Never from what I can recall.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by AutobotKickshift (talk • contribs) 17:15, 3 October 2012.

The point is not whether your caption is "better," the point is that it's not your place to "improve" captions. Please stop edit-warring or I'll have to give you a time-out.--RosicrucianTalk 17:45, 3 October 2012 (EDT)

So even as a member I'm not allowed to contribute to previously written articles? even if, not in this case, the information is lacking or new information has been released? how is that fair?

All you've done is edit war on an image caption. How is that contributing new information?--Carrion 19:56, 3 October 2012 (EDT)

I thought maybe readers would enjoy a joke more if they could actually GET IT. where did the ice cream joke even come from?

Retrieved from "https://tfwiki.duckdns.org/index.php?title=User_talk:AutobotKickshift&oldid=758680"