Talk:Neon: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
DrSpengler (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The Nemesis Prime picture doesn't seem to appear for me at larger than 200px for whatever reason. This happens nowhere else. Any reason why? | The Nemesis Prime picture doesn't seem to appear for me at larger than 200px for whatever reason. This happens nowhere else. Any reason why? | ||
I occassionally I have trouble like that. Usually when it's a pic that's 500 x 500 px, for example, that's thumbnailed at 250px. Apparantly everybody else can see it and it's just my cruddy monitor settings. --[[User:DrSpengler|DrSpengler]] 21:22, 28 August 2006 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | I occassionally I have trouble like that. Usually when it's a pic that's 500 x 500 px, for example, that's thumbnailed at 250px. Apparantly everybody else can see it and it's just my cruddy monitor settings. --[[User:DrSpengler|DrSpengler]] 21:22, 28 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
Wiki articles are supposed to present fact, whereas the tone of this articile seems biased. This article, and I am not being specific because I feel it applies to the whole article, is sarcastic and expresses an agenda against one side of an arguement.<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | |||
Revision as of 08:30, 29 August 2006
The Nemesis Prime picture doesn't seem to appear for me at larger than 200px for whatever reason. This happens nowhere else. Any reason why?
I occassionally I have trouble like that. Usually when it's a pic that's 500 x 500 px, for example, that's thumbnailed at 250px. Apparantly everybody else can see it and it's just my cruddy monitor settings. --DrSpengler 21:22, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Wiki articles are supposed to present fact, whereas the tone of this articile seems biased. This article, and I am not being specific because I feel it applies to the whole article, is sarcastic and expresses an agenda against one side of an arguement.
