Talk:Brainstorm (G1): Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Perhaps a little too much IDW-focus in the opening summary? |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
While I appreciate the recognition that the Japanese version of Brainstorm is rather different than the version in the first-paragraph summary, the summary is also significantly different (aside from the mention of Arcana) from any ''other'' non-IDW version. --[[User:G.B. Blackrock|G.B. Blackrock]] ([[User talk:G.B. Blackrock|talk]]) 14:44, 3 January 2014 (EST) | While I appreciate the recognition that the Japanese version of Brainstorm is rather different than the version in the first-paragraph summary, the summary is also significantly different (aside from the mention of Arcana) from any ''other'' non-IDW version. --[[User:G.B. Blackrock|G.B. Blackrock]] ([[User talk:G.B. Blackrock|talk]]) 14:44, 3 January 2014 (EST) | ||
::I agree. The dodgy and amoral stuff is strictly IDW when it comes to Brainstorm.--[[User:Nu-Priest|Nu-Priest]] ([[User talk:Nu-Priest|talk]]) 14:59, 3 January 2014 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 19:59, 3 January 2014
While I appreciate the recognition that the Japanese version of Brainstorm is rather different than the version in the first-paragraph summary, the summary is also significantly different (aside from the mention of Arcana) from any other non-IDW version. --G.B. Blackrock (talk) 14:44, 3 January 2014 (EST)
