Talk:Drift (AOE): Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
KirbyForce1 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Since his only ROTF appearances were cancelled, is he now Drift (AOE)? Or are we gonna be really strict about this? --[[User:Flicky1991|flicky]][[User talk:Flicky1991|1991]] 04:16, 3 May 2014 (EDT) | Since his only ROTF appearances were cancelled, is he now Drift (AOE)? Or are we gonna be really strict about this? --[[User:Flicky1991|flicky]][[User talk:Flicky1991|1991]] 04:16, 3 May 2014 (EDT) | ||
:I'm more curious if there are any good promotional renders of him out there yet to replace that mainpic (and caption). --[[User:Detour|Detour]] ([[User talk:Detour|talk]]) 05:23, 3 May 2014 (EDT) | :I'm more curious if there are any good promotional renders of him out there yet to replace that mainpic (and caption). --[[User:Detour|Detour]] ([[User talk:Detour|talk]]) 05:23, 3 May 2014 (EDT) | ||
His ROTF and AoE selves are obviously 2 separate characters, so they should be given their own pages rather than being included together. | |||
[[User:KirbyForce1|KirbyForce1]],23:38, 4th of May 2014 | |||
Revision as of 22:37, 4 May 2014
So, he's a toy-only character who had all of his toys canceled... should he be placed in the "Things that don't exist" category, then, or does his inclusion as a cross-sell negate this? Inkblot 00:43, 19 December 2011 (EST)
Regarding to Drift's role in Age of Extinction
Just imagine the prediction to Drift's role in AOE: His role will (probably) make Japanese Culture Lovers facepalm. FigureGunplaFan, 11:58AM, 12th of April 2014
Disambig
Since his only ROTF appearances were cancelled, is he now Drift (AOE)? Or are we gonna be really strict about this? --flicky1991 04:16, 3 May 2014 (EDT)
- I'm more curious if there are any good promotional renders of him out there yet to replace that mainpic (and caption). --Detour (talk) 05:23, 3 May 2014 (EDT)
His ROTF and AoE selves are obviously 2 separate characters, so they should be given their own pages rather than being included together. KirbyForce1,23:38, 4th of May 2014
