Talk:Software Wars: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm still not convinced a footnote is the right way to reference this stuff, thus me just putting them in as comments for future generations to decide. Oh well- if a better solution comes along we'll adopt it I guess. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 06:12, 21 October 2006 (UTC) | I'm still not convinced a footnote is the right way to reference this stuff, thus me just putting them in as comments for future generations to decide. Oh well- if a better solution comes along we'll adopt it I guess. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 06:12, 21 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
:I was wondering what the point of those invisible-in-the-article notations of yours was. Footnotes work well enough for me. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 07:55, 21 October 2006 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | :I was wondering what the point of those invisible-in-the-article notations of yours was. Footnotes work well enough for me. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 07:55, 21 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
::Sometimes they're just notes I want to put in with a mind for redrafting (or even drafting if nothing's there) the article later. Basically something I don't want to lose, because I feel it's signifigant. In this case- the sources are signifigant, but I'm not sure hwo to note it- so invisi-note. "This way if we DO come up with a good, instinctive system, no one has to puzzle over which sources this article used." -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 08:33, 21 October 2006 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | |||
Revision as of 08:33, 21 October 2006
I'm still not convinced a footnote is the right way to reference this stuff, thus me just putting them in as comments for future generations to decide. Oh well- if a better solution comes along we'll adopt it I guess. -Derik 06:12, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- I was wondering what the point of those invisible-in-the-article notations of yours was. Footnotes work well enough for me. --KilMichaelMcC 07:55, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Sometimes they're just notes I want to put in with a mind for redrafting (or even drafting if nothing's there) the article later. Basically something I don't want to lose, because I feel it's signifigant. In this case- the sources are signifigant, but I'm not sure hwo to note it- so invisi-note. "This way if we DO come up with a good, instinctive system, no one has to puzzle over which sources this article used." -Derik 08:33, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
