Talk:Ripsnorter
OTP? --FortMax 17:51, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
#5 -Derik 17:57, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
We have no way of knowing the guy in the picture isn't Pounder. -LV 18:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
He's reacting to the immediacy of Claw's death- Ripersnorter and Switchbalde were closer to claw than Pounder. he's closer to switchblade, who is his partner. he has a weapon in his hand-- mentioned of Rippersnorter but not Pounder.
I see several reasons to label him as Rippersnorter, none at all to call him Pounder. (The image's composition si dubious anyway- only Sunstreaker should be coming from that direction, and all the autobots should still be in their alt-mode at the moment this illo. represents.) -Derik 18:49, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Setting aside the absurdity of saying "we can tell this and this and this from the image's composition; also, the image clearly doesn't represent an actual instant from the narrative", he's closer to Switchblade than WHO? Either Ripsnorter or Pounder is not shown. For all we know, Ripsnorter is immediately off-panel to Switchblade's left, which would make him closer than the orange guy. I think it's disingenous to present this as unambiguously Ripsnorter. Claw has claws. Switchblade has blades covering him. Steamhammer has hammers. The other two are almost entirely undescribed physically, and neither is particularly more important a character. -LV 18:55, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Ripsnorter has a gun. But very well, I shall add a note that it's not 100% certain this is the correct ID. -Derik 18:59, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Continuity note
Walky, why in seven unholy fucks are you editing the continuity note so that it no longer actually tells you the continuity, but only the continuity family?
And you better have a great answer for this. -Derik 20:38, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Because, unlike you, the rest of us don't decide new and exciting ways to change the formatting of the pages every other week and then create scores of pages the wrong way, and then get all pissy when they get edited back to fit our Style Guide. --ItsWalky 20:43, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
