Talk:A Change to the Agenda

Xaaron, no one has anything nice to say about this comic but you. Have you actually read it? And, if so, have you actually read any of the other Beast Wars: Uprising fiction? If not, and I get the strong impression you haven't, I don't think your view has any validity. Continuum, which you brought up, is a perfect comparison. Like Continuum, this comic does not stand on its own. It has no new artwork and precious little new dialogue. What dialogue it does add is clunky and exposition-laden. We learn nothing about the characters we don't already know. Like Continuum, the sole raison d'etre of this book is to inform existing fiction. It's very reasonable to judge it harshly when it fails at the only thing it sets out to do. I notice that you didn't remove any of the actual errors, just the commentary about why releasing an error-laden comic is bad. Since we've had five editors besides yourself contribute to this article, if you strongly feel that this comic has merit of any kind, I think you should take it here rather than just cutting out the parts of the article you don't like.

As for the Dawn of the Predacus comparison, it's perfectly reasonable to point out that they didn't learn their lessons from it. It may have been IDW produced, but it was done for them, about their characters. I remember NightViper coming onto the boards to defend it. So they were certainly aware of its existence and reception. --Giggidy (talk) 08:39, 17 August 2016 (EDT)