Talk:Micronauts (franchise)

So, just to shoot a hypothetical, assuming the "Transformers: Micronauts" thing ever happens, will we then split it so we have a "Micronauts (IDW)" page, "Transformers: Micronauts" page, and a "Micronauts (franchise)" page? Because it was because of the "Transformers: Micronauts" thing that I thought it warranted a franchise page (like we have with G.I. Joe). --DannyBoy (talk) 11:34, 28 September 2016 (EDT)

All we have of "Transformers: Micronauts" is a single picture. If it ever actually happens, then I'd say yes, separate "Micronauts (comic)" and a "Micronauts (franchise)" pages would be fine. --Riptide (talk) 11:37, 28 September 2016 (EDT)

Micronauts: Revolution

I can't say I agree with relegating issues to a subsection of this page. It's really inelegant and risks burdening the page with length. Saix (talk) 13:00, 28 September 2016 (EDT)

I'd be fine with a separate page, but I think this is okay. If it gets burdened down, yeah, we can revisit it, but given that the extent of the Transformers content was one panel, I think this is a reasonable compromise. --Riptide (talk) 13:02, 28 September 2016 (EDT)

For reference, the idea discussed on the Allspark is that issues with very brief Transformer appearances like this would get a quick summary on this article, whereas any issues with Transformers properly guest starring would be linked out to a full issue article. Jalaguy (talk) 13:03, 28 September 2016 (EDT)

That seems too inconsistent and will be a linking nightmare. Saix (talk) 13:09, 28 September 2016 (EDT)

Linking nightmare? If a link to one of the issues on this article was called for, you'd simply link to the header or an anchor, no...? Jalaguy (talk) 13:14, 28 September 2016 (EDT)