User talk:Vectorwing

Please stop branding every non-character drone an Autobot or a Decepticon. That's not how it works. Saix (talk) 19:45, 27 March 2018 (EDT)

He is right about some of them, though; you wouldn't remove a Vehicon symbol from the various drones there. Certainly, I don't think things like the Alligatorcon require it, but not everything he's added to is wrong. Escargon (talk) 19:49, 27 March 2018 (EDT)

Ah wait, nevermind, I thought you were talking about the faction symbols at the top of the page. Escargon (talk) 19:50, 27 March 2018 (EDT)

If it has a faction symbol it is only right that it should be on a decepticons or autobots list. Vectorwing

No, they're just associated with the factions. It's like the Ark or the Autobot code, they're Autobot related, but not Autobots. Tindalos (talk) 21:23, 27 March 2018 (EDT)

Battle Android Troopers are not Decepticons. Auto-Combatants are not Autobots. The Alligaticon is not a Decepticon. Stop adding this. - Chris McFeely (talk) 21:21, 27 March 2018 (EDT)

ok thank you for helping me understand Tindalos.Vectorwing

Stop adding categories if you're not competent at it. Saix (talk) 22:27, 27 March 2018 (EDT)

STOP

Ok but please let me add a few of them to decepticons like autoscout. Vectorwing

No. They aren't characters. And you really need to work on your grammar, spelling, and capitalization before you do any work here. --Khajidha (talk) 11:51, 28 March 2018 (EDT)

Then why is Apex Bomber considered an Autobot if he is a drone. If you can answer that then I will stop and do not tell me it is because he has more story. Vectorwing If we are also going down this path than why is Air Warrior considered a decepticon if it is a drone. Vectorwing

Nobody is obligated to entertain your arguments. If multiple people have reversed your edits, you are to stop. Saix (talk) 12:02, 28 March 2018 (EDT)