Category talk:Lunartix

From MediaWiki
Revision as of 03:24, 12 May 2007 by Suki Brits (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Dude, there's only THREE of them. That's so not enough for a category. --M Sipher 22:07, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Directors, Executives, Poets have the same; Gangsters, Hippies, and Voice directors have only four; Martial arts, Multimedia, and Scramble City have two. What should the cutoff be, five entries? --Rotty 22:40, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
We've had this discussion before; it was decided to go with over a half-dozen (like, 8+) just so we don't have every single goddamn subgroup ever with its own pointless category when the normal article will suffice. And not everything with more than that really needs to be a Category (like the color-coded Armada game Mini-Con teams).
As for your examples... some of these, I think, need to go. "Poets" and "Hippies" need to go... "Gangsters" can probably stay, as the first issue of Matrix Quest alone should provide us with enough (especially taking into account that the Decepticons were the "robot mob"). "Directors/Voice Directors" can probably be combined, plus if you take into account the sheer amount of creator pages that do not yet should exist, categories along those lines should fill up in due time. (Categories SHOULD be made if there are enough unmade pages that qualify.) Martial arts should go, with the pages shifting to "Transformer culture" or whatever is most appropriate. Scramble City? Drop it. Multimedia... what the hell is in that, anyway? (Looks) Odd category. And... pretty vague. Will have to look into what else conceivably qualifies for it. --M Sipher 03:20, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

If you can't remember what the exact number for the cutoff is (there isn't one), just keep in mind that we specifically do not have categories for combiner teams. So if a category could only possibly have less articles than, say, a potential Computron category, then there had better be a very good reason for making it. --Suki Brits 03:24, 12 May 2007 (UTC)