Talk:Terrorcon (G1)

Terrorcon currently directs here. I argue that the Energon Terrorcons are more prominent (being an essential series element) and it should go there. Are there any dissenting opinions? -Derik 00:01, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

True, the Energon Terrorcons are more prominent, but these guys aren't exactly throw aways either. -- SFH 00:04, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

And if we had 3- it would go to the disambig page. We have 2. It goes to one or the other. Mind if I move it? -Derik 00:08, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

IDW tag

I know they havn't appeared much in the IDW-verse, but shouldn't it still have the "ongoing fiction" tag?--Megatron Prime 13:27, 29 July 2010 (EDT)

I believe that the ongoing fiction tag is for characters confirmed to be recurring in an ongoing comic. The Terrocons have only shown up once. If, say, they get their own mini-series, then it could be added. --NCZ 13:31, 29 July 2010 (EDT)

Didn't we have this discussion before, regarding the Insecticon swarm? The fact that they haven't appeared yet doesn't mean they won't appear again.

(On a semi-related note, I fully expect IDW to have the Terrorcons show up now that I've said this.) ---Blackout- 14:11, 29 July 2010 (EDT)

They are out there somewhere. I wonder what kind of mischief they are getting into. - Starfield 14:28, 29 July 2010 (EDT)

To me the "ongoing fiction" tag tells me that they are actually in the next issue(s). Or at least have a reasonable chance of showing up soon. If it has been 4 months or more since the last appearance with no upcoming appearances announced, it doesn't seem "ongoing" to me. --Khajidha 15:03, 29 July 2010 (EDT)

Their chances of showing up soon have actually increased exponentially because of this debate. :D

Hey, that's what happened with the Insecticon swarm. ---Blackout- 15:13, 29 July 2010 (EDT)

Cindersaur

I know we all assumed POTP would make Cindersaur a Terrorcon, but is there any evidence that it's actually the case?