Template talk:Comicstory
From MediaWiki
In what way is this better than what we currently use? I don't understand the point at all. --Suki Brits 18:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- The current format just looks ugly and mismanaged to me. If it's only me that likes this, I won't cry over deletion. Interrobang 19:01, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
I'd like to see it in use.Oh, you have it here...- ...that's not bad. All the contribuiter fields are plural, it's canted for covering stories, not issues (we do sometimes have articles for ulti-part stories folded into one, can you think of a way to rephrase the)issue number' so that say, 32-36 would make sense as a possible value?
- Also, we need a series field. I want this box to say 'Panni Armada Comic' on it somewhere, not just the publisher. And if Dreamwave hadn't subtitled its G1 minis, we'd have to do 'Dreamwave Generation 1 v2', etc. It should support that functionality.
- If we're integrating that, might it make sense to integrate comicvav in some less verbose fashion? We have publisher, issue, how about previous and next as %lt;%lt; and %gt;%gt;? (the only problem is that the logical place to put those controls is above the title, which is kinda obnoxious.) -Derik 19:28, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

