Talk:List of computers

(G.B. Blackrock: 2006/03/10 - 4:11 pm PST) Shouldn't "Teletraan" be spelled "Teletran"? (not just assuming that the title of the Wiki gets it right) User:G.B. Blackrock

The spelling used in the Transformers Writers Bible has two "A"s http://transformers.winterchill.com/bible/biblepage3.html -Bobby

The original scripts and the series bible refer to it as 'Teletraan'.

(G.B. Blackrock: 2006/03/10 - 4:32 pm PST) In the absence of other sources (like, did the name ever appear on-screen?), I'm happy to go with this. However, it should be noted that few series "bibles" are considered canon very far into a series. They just tell writers how to get started, most of the time. User:G.B. Blackrock

Innocent!

Seriously, why do we need this? It's against the style manual, it doesn't link to even half of the computers that have articles, and it's redundant when considering Category:Computers.--Rosicrucian 16:45, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

It's not redundant if you want to see computers listed by continuity. --ItsWalky 16:48, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Which would be all well and good if it did that instead of listed them by faction.--Rosicrucian 16:50, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, that helps too! Let's rewrite the page so it's more informative in its categorization. --ItsWalky 16:51, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Alright, there's my first shot at it.--Rosicrucian 17:05, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

And now after a couple revisions on top of that, it at least has all the ones the category listed, which it didn't before.--Rosicrucian 17:19, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Concerning computers without articles.

If a computer isn't noteworthy enough to have its own article, it can still be listed on this page I'd say. However as this is only a list I'd prefer if all computers listed here linked to some article. The computer's owner or a comic issue/animated episode summary would do. That way we at least avoid simple namedropping like the older version of this article.--Rosicrucian 19:22, 2 September 2007 (UTC)