User talk:159.134.163.42
From MediaWiki
Sorry about the earlier comment.
- Why? I've done nothing wrong. You're the only one doing something wrong by trying to block someone's access to the site who's done nothing wrong. That's pretty nasty, actually. You do realise this shows up as a "New message" for me too, right? Pretty un-covert if you're trying to talk over my head. And very disrespectful if you knew what you were doing. I really can't see any way of looking at this situation that casts you as the good guy.
- This isn't the right way to start a dialogue, Chiasaur11. But seriously, just tone it down a little. The image I'm getting of you is someone who is starting to foam at the mouth. -- SFH 19:01, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- No, but I am someone who's laughing quite a bit. I and some other of my friends have been pissed on a lot on forums and it's somewhat amusing to see people defending this kind of nonsense and really not succeeding even when they have a majority.
- His only apparent motive is to vandalize. Rather than trying to have an actual discussion of whatever viewpoint he's trying to present on the talk pages, he's out to start stupid revert wars in the articles themselves. I don't see what we'd lose by banning him. Chip 19:25, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.
