User talk:Rosicrucian

Re: Galvatron (G1), Transformers (2007)

LISTEN UP FOOL, we are having a little bit of conflict at the moment i dont want that, but my idea's are funny and brawl is devastator, but pleese lets not fight any futher —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.165.241.232 (talk • contribs) 07:02, 5 August 2007.

Your the fool, i agree with you, the eye joke is funny, and i like to call brawl Devastator, but ahhhhh that dosent give you the right to create talk pages calling people "lunch box" and "snack pack" now pleese excuse me while i ask for you to be blocked for a year, that should tech you, "lunch box" --Galvason 08:21, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, good luck with that. I doubt anyone is going to ban Rosicrucian at all, much less for a year, for reverting a blatantly racist joke that you repeatedly put into the article. - Dark T Zeratul 09:14, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Some confusion here. Galvason was talking to the anonymous editor who put in said racist joke, and was calling for the banning of that very anonymous editor. He was not calling for Rosicrucian to be banned.

People, please sign your talk page entries, and please keep discussion on pages where it is relevant. This particular conversation is veering off track from having anything to do with Rosicrucian at all. --Sntint 09:26, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Tigatron / Polar Claw

An anonymous editor recently changed one of your additions to the Tigatron article: [1]. I don't really remember the story anymore; your version sounds right to me, but I'm not sure enough of it to make the revert myself. Take a look? --Steve-o 04:27, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Easily done. I've elaborated on the production choices that led to this decision, and the lingering link back to the original character reflected in where Tigatron awakened.--Rosicrucian 05:20, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Furman

Really? I didn't think it was that mean, and the guy does write freaking EVERYTHING what do you think I should do to change it? Like, what was too snarky about it? --70.190.251.10 00:58, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

I would've said that it's a bit exaggerated, but considering the man wrote a freakin' "How to draw Transformers" book when he's not an artist, I'd say 70.190's edit were pretty much on the money. Maybe de-snarkicize them a little but not outright remove them. --Detour 01:33, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Awesome, thank you. Though I really wish that bubble bath joke could have stayed. You're probably right though... (sigh) --70.190.251.10 01:59, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

I don't know, I think I knee-jerked a bit. Feel free to add it back in, I won't touch it. See what others think.--Rosicrucian 02:00, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Nah, it's totally cool. It was kinda snarky, and I am an IP after all. Your version reads a lot more professional, and I think the world will survive without my "Simon Furman wrote the instructions on the back of the TF bubble bath" joke. Thanks again. --70.190.251.10 02:04, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Pluralis majestatis

Fine... We shall keep to the old captions, although we are not amused by them. --Lenny 19:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

No More Twinkies for Starcrunch

k... sorry. I thought I was allowed to have a bit of fun on Teletraan-1. I guess not? Please ask before taking down my stuff. I'll say yes like 99.9% of the time. --Starcrunch 16:09, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, I didn't mark it for deletion, and I don't have the power to take it down. That's pretty much why I asked on the talkpage first rather than slapping a deletion template on it.--Rosicrucian 16:16, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

If you contributed to this wiki before creating a self-indulgent image-intensive User page which expanded into a separate disambiguation page, we probably wouldn't mind as much. Okay, we'd still mind the separate disambiguation page. That was just ridiculous. --ItsWalky 16:19, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Ouch... Thanks for that lovely incentive to continue contributing. I've been coming to Teletraan-1 for a long time, and finally signed up yesterday. I admit that prior to creating my User pages, I had only contributed only one insignificant picture to an article marked as needing one, but I can't fix every stub in one day! I thought I could help improve this thing and have a little fun at the same time. Maybe I was wrong, but I'm gonna keep trying to contribute... despite all your wonderful hospitality. --Starcrunch 16:36, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Throw a party

Hey! Assaulthead the guy that you know is executed for hacking, beating me up and murdering a teacher! Please don't block me if I promise to behave and don't copy my bigger brother that is forever blocked. Hey why you called me spearhead?(Spearhead 04:28, 7 October 2007 (UTC))

Rartorata

I noticed an image you uploaded of Rartorata uses a different spelling of his name than the character's article and the dialogue in the scan itself. Was that intentional (why?), or would you mind re-uploading the scan with a corrected filename? --Sntint 23:43, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Sntint, nobody cares about one letter. As long as the filename is descriptive and is unique. Interrobang 23:48, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

It's mainly because like most people I can't spell the guy's name worth a damn. But yeah, I noticed it after uploading and figured that this was the one character I could get away with it on.--Rosicrucian 23:54, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

*shrug* Okay. --Sntint 13:43, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

I fixed it. It took me a whole 30 seconds of work. --Steve-o 14:16, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

IDW G1 issues

Hi, Hearts of Steel and IDW's Beast Wars series, while not part of their main ongoing G1 series, are still part of G1 issues published by IDW, and hense should be included in IDW Generation 1 issues. --MistaTee 15:57, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

But the "IDW Generation 1 issues" category is SPECIFICALLY for issues of their main ongoing G1 series. --ItsWalky 16:19, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Eh, yeah I guess it's better than making a "IDW outside of the main continuity Generation 1 issues" category. --MistaTee 16:34, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

As I said in the edit summary, there will one day be more Evolutions titles. At such a time we can move them over to there.--Rosicrucian^Talk 16:38, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

And for that matter the Beast Wars issues are their own animal, to the point of getting a distinct timeline.--Rosicrucian^Talk 16:41, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

stub fixes

Changing to the various types of stubs is a good thing. However, while going through, see if the article REALLY is a stub. Many of these seem to be fairly well-filled out articles. Maybe apply the stub to a particular section if it needs it. Thanks. --MistaTee 01:26, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

As I mentioned on the stub template talkpage, I'm doing this entirely as just changing one type of stub for another. Otherwise it would be an even more Sisyphean task than it already is. What I'm hoping is that once the stubs are sorted, determining which tags to remove will be easier.--Rosicrucian^Talk 01:28, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Cool, appreciate the work! --MistaTee 02:57, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Hey man. You just chased a guy who got blocked here multiple times from here to the Wikipedia. You proved that you know Starcraft by telling don't copy articles from Starcraft Wiki to Wikipedia. Also why most of you Wikians are also at Wikipedia?(76.195.186.73 00:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC))

From Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki, a Wikia wiki.