Talk:Pete Sinclair

Pete's Robot Convention Items

Should we mention every one of it's items on their respective character pages's (included toy pages) note sections? FigureGunplaFan (talk) 13:38, 24 June 2017 (EDT)

unsavory aspects

should we add something about the type of person he is?--Kitsune1 (talk) 23:29, 22 July 2020 (EDT)

I mean, the mainpic caption is right there. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 00:33, 23 July 2020 (EDT)

That doesn't add any info beyond "he's a douche," and considering everything I think some elaboration would be useful. Voxel 23:20, 14 August 2020 (EDT)

Considering the sheer number of fans gone official, and how so many of them have long and public internet histories, this wiki has erred on the side of not dwelling on their Internet fights, except if they have actually defrauded customers / staff. His unsavory aspects are off-topic. --Thylacine 2000 (talk) 23:28, 14 August 2020 (EDT)

Didn't he actually scam people with badly painted toys he claimed to be legit? That seems like "defrauding customers" to me. Voxel (talk) 13:24, 13 September 2020 (EDT)

IMO there should be [i]some[/i] sort of overview of whatever he did, in order to make the references to him on other pages, as well as the mainpic caption, make sense. Despite Cyberlink420's attempt to use it as a dismissal, the mainpic caption does not, in fact, actually say anything substantive; it only raises questions that the page currently does not answer. The job of a wiki is to inform, not make people even more confused. If you can't actually be bothered to explain, you shouldn't make the references in the first place. ZTS is Very Sorry (talk) 01:58, 23 November 2020 (EST)