Talk:Blitzwing (Animated)

From MediaWiki
Revision as of 16:22, 20 February 2008 by JW (talk | contribs) (Trivia section)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Considering the way his Angry face talks, might it be worth it to replace the Letterman reference with an Arnold Schwarzenegger reference? --Detour 19:21, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Works either way for me, but Letterman's just who I thought of first. Of course, as you note, with the whole Teutonic accent thing (NB: I haven't seen the episode yet, but that's not a big spoiler for me), Ah-nold might be a closer comparison. The idea of a feverish Letterman strikes me as funnier, though.--Apcog 20:04, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Good point, but Arnold also has a gap in his teeth. I think the ressemblance to Arnold was intentional, much like that Rainier Wolfcastle fellow. --Detour 20:37, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Point taken, especially now that I've watched the scene myself--Apcog 23:32, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Toy Feet

Okay, whenever we get a pic of his robot mode, I nominate it be captioned: "i hAv FEEEET!11 yAy!"--Apcog 23:32, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey where is his vehicle mode? Do you have any proof that he is a triple changer?(EDD! 01:07, 5 January 2008 (UTC))

Yes. --ItsWalky 01:10, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Well where is it then? I will pay you $9999999999 dollars if you can show an image of him in his two vehicle modes.(EDD! 01:12, 5 January 2008 (UTC))

They were seen at BotCon, so the pictures aren't publically available. - Chris McFeely 01:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
http://tformers.com/ig.php?mode=view&album=8194&pic=DSCF1322.JPG&dispsize=800&start=60 I expect payment. --ItsWalky 01:15, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Trivia section

For the sake of wiki integrity (I'll wait while you snicker), I'd recommend establishing a citation ASAP for that interview mentioning the idea for the character who can transform into anything. Also, while it's kind of interesting, I think the whole tie-in to three-faced representations of Buddha/Hindu deities is really tangential at best.--Apcog 15:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Okay, citation's in. (Thank you, Walky.)--Apcog 15:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
"I think the whole tie-in to three-faced representations of Buddha/Hindu deities is really tangential at best" How do you feel about the Man-E-Faces and Ashuraman stuff? It's equally relevant. JW 15:58, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Man-E-Faces is a toy with a three-face switching gimmick. As such, it is just slightly more relevant to another toy with a three-face switching gimmick than, say, Hindu mythology.--RosicrucianTalk 16:11, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Do we want to open the door for every instance of "this toy has a gimmick like this other non-Transformers toy"?
Or, if the three-faces thing is unusual enough to warrant an exception, the fact that it appears in two of the world's oldest religions, with 1.3 billion followers between them, might bear mentioning. Just saying. JW 16:22, 20 February 2008 (UTC)