File talk:Seekers ad.jpg

From MediaWiki
Revision as of 15:46, 15 January 2008 by JW (talk | contribs) (Are Catalogs Canon?)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Are Catalogs Canon?

This ad is interesting in another way, besides the appearance of the word "Seeker". It strongly suggests that "Diakron Multi-Force Robot" is a Transformer. If catalogs are canon, then I guess we need a page for this guy. If catalogs are not canon, we should specifically mention that on the canon page. JW 15:29, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

'Canon' is something approved by Hasbro/Takara/Someone-with-the-authority-to-approve-things.
AFAIK, we consider Seeker canon not because it's in the Sears ad- but because it's a proper noun in the ad, and one of the few parts not just a mash of generic description. We think Seeker was official internally-generated copy generated by Hasbro, and the ad just reflects its existence.
The logic is, given the prevalence of the term in the fandom and the swear-up-and-down memory it's real, the term 'Seeker' was probably in many obscure advertisements (thus why it's so cemented in the fandom's ur-memory)... but this is just the only example we've found. (Who saves old holiday catalogs?) -Derik 15:43, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
My point was rather that the casual fan might not be clear on whether catalogs are "something approved by Hasbro/Takara". So we should make it clear, one way or the other. JW 15:46, 15 January 2008 (UTC)