Template talk:Featured
From MediaWiki
Revamp
|
|
In my mind, this template competes with a lot of our other boxes, like disambigs and noname boxes, for space. We're getting a bit cluttered up top, so I propose a revamp of the featured box to something a little more space friendly.--RosicrucianTalk 12:47, 6 May 2009 (EDT)
- Still obnoxious. I prefer how Wookieepedia and Wikipedia does it: Just a star in the corner, and the "This is a featured article" crap in the talk page where it belongs.
- A lot of our clutter problems could be solved by removing the vast majority of disambig templates. One does not go to Megatron (BW) looking for other Megatrons. They type in "Megatron" and go right to Megatron (disambiguation). Other Wikis seem to be able to realize this but we're dead set on our stupidity. —Interrobang 23:13, 6 May 2009 (EDT)
- I also think our disambig system is also just fine. There are plenty of ways of perusing the wiki that don't involve typing stuff into the search page. --KilMichaelMcC 23:29, 6 May 2009 (EDT)
I think the current Featured Article template is just fine. And you know, even if I didn't? I won't just unilaterally decide to start changing it without any discussion. --KilMichaelMcC 23:17, 6 May 2009 (EDT)
Revamp Sandbox
To show how this would interact with our current boxes, a sample. The idea is that it can exist on the same line as these templates.--RosicrucianTalk 23:24, 6 May 2009 (EDT)
|
|
| The name or term "Optimus Prime" refers to more than one character or idea. For a list of other meanings, see Optimus Prime (disambiguation). |


