Talk:Transformers: Shattered Glass (toyline)

I see we're listing these by size class, which makes sense, but in Shattered Glass they're not called Mini-Cons, they're called Micromasters. I guess it's not a big deal, but it seems kind of funny to list them here as Mini-Cons. --Crockalley 18:51, 11 July 2009 (EDT)

I didn't know they where called Micromasters I just assumed that they where called Mini-Cons as that's what they're based of. Dead Metal 02:09, 12 July 2009 (EDT)

Section order

I'd like to suggest that we can move the Decepticon section above the Autobot section, just like this. --TX55^TALK 02:51, 12 July 2009 (EDT)

Done. Dead Metal 02:55, 12 July 2009 (EDT)

Micromasters

Now I don't know how to do it correctly noting that they're based off Mino-Cons, as a reference on just one character it seems a little odd and unclean, as trivia it kinda works but that's kinda too low, under the actual Micromasters headline it'S kinda pointless and repetitive given that we have that section 4 times. So how should we handle this? Dead Metal 09:36, 12 July 2009 (EDT)

The trivia note looks fine to me. --Crockalley 12:20, 12 July 2009 (EDT)

Redecos

Um, why shouldn't we list the potential redecos? We state right in the intro that "Quite a few additional Shattered character designs are based on existing toys/characters with new color schemes, meaning they potentially could be manufactured some day, or recreated by enterprising kitbashers," so why shouldn't we list what existing toys those potential schemes are based on, for the sake of giving readers information? The whole toyline is mostly virtual anyway, in that there's only a small handful of officially sold SG-branded toys, so anything we add beyond that is unrelated to real world brands anyway. --Jeysie 11:06, 14 July 2009 (EDT)