User talk:Ninjabot33

From MediaWiki
Revision as of 11:41, 11 October 2009 by Ninjabot33 (talk | contribs) (→???)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Bulkhead Syndrome

The general feeling is that this term isn't widespread enough among the fandom to merit an article. This could change, but until it does, I recommend you copy over the contents of the article into a sandbox page connected to your user page. (Register first, then search for an article called (YOUR USER NAME)/Sandbox. The wiki will prompt you to create the page, since it won't exist. Paste in your article, and it can be preserved there until such time as any of its material is needed.

Mr, Nameless, please sign your posts!
---Blackout- 15:05, 2 September 2009 (EDT)


Don't call me Mr. Nameless, call me Ninjabot33 (imagine I said that in a really dramatic fasion) OK I'll put it in a f***ing sandbox stop asking --Ninjabot33 16:14, 4 September 2009 (EDT)

"No doubt our wit is too slyly subtle for them to appreciate."
"No doubt our wit is too slyly subtle for them to appreciate."
"Apparently, some of your kind saw fit to decorate me while I was waiting."

If you haven't yet contributed anything, we'd really rather you didn't simply change jokes or add new ones without adding actual content. This also holds true for removing captions whole-hog or replacing them with "information" that really isn't.
Remember, we're meant to be informative first, funny second. Write an episode summary, check out the Most Wanted Pages list or the Stubs list.
For further information, see: Project:Captions

Please stop changing the same Chak and Una caption, it will only get reverted every time. -Mazenoise 14:17, 3 September 2009 (EDT)

That sucks, anyway I have contributed lots of things in articles I just wanted a link to the human sidekicks in Chak and Una.--86.162.84.38 16:05, 4 September 2009 (EDT)


Don't get too discouraged, dude. Sometimes the fandom is an echo chamber, and a given fan term can seem bigger than it is. Some of the stuff in the article you made is valid, and with some minor refining I think it'll be at home as a section of Scale. If you want to sandbox your stuff and work on it in your user space before taking it prime-time, just let me know when you've got everything saved, and I'll delete the original article.--RosicrucianTalk 12:28, 4 September 2009 (EDT)

I think I've just found my mirrorverse counterpart. ---Blackout- 12:44, 4 September 2009 (EDT)
I agree with -Blackout-. --Ninjabot33 13:12, 4 September 2009 (EDT)

???

Okay, so what's the point in adding Bulky to Ghosts or Bee to Vampires? Is it supposed to be funny, or what...? Sorry, but I totally don't get it. -- Silvery 14:37, 15 September 2009 (EDT)

A reference to their costumes in Along Came a Spider. Whether they actually belong in those categories is still debatable. - Cattleprod 14:41, 15 September 2009 (EDT)
Well, yes, I've got THAT part, but I don't get the "necessity" part... -- Silvery 14:43, 15 September 2009 (EDT)
Why do any bat like characters go in that category? --Ninjabot33 14:44, 15 September 2009 (EDT)
In the same manner, even if Sari wasn't technorganic already, I wouldn't add her to Transformers category just because she cosplayed Optimus on one Halloween night, you know... -- Silvery 14:53, 15 September 2009 (EDT)
Okay, but I still think "Count dracubot" deserves to be in that category more than Megatron does just for having a bat for an alt mode. --Ninjabot33 07:41, 11 October 2009 (EDT)
Retrieved from "https://tfwiki.duckdns.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Ninjabot33&oldid=375829"