Talk:Breakdown (G1)

Since there's only one guy actually named 'Breakdown', would there be any objections to moving the page to Breakdown? - RolonBolon 06:45, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm in favor of it. --Andrusi 20:09, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Does anyone have any evidence of the alledged "gold hood sticker" on Classics Breakdown? I bought my UK version off the shelves back then, and it was (and still is) red... --Fighbird 10:17, 26 September 2009 (EDT)

Ok I'm not sure if this falls under the category of strange, pety or a little of both. As soon as I read TF Ongoing issue 1, I immediately added that to the wiki entry for breakdown. Anyway a couple of months back I check back only to find that the entry has completely changed to a less detailed one but also that my account had been deleted. If someone wanted to make style changes here and there fine, I can understand that (I even referenced it as being Tf Ongoing 1 so that when the synopsis was done for it, it could be crosslinked- that reference was soon deleted by another member). But short of some weird mystical glitch where the site somehow maqnaged to lose member data; to not only go for a less detailed account of the section but to also remove my account for reporting FACTUAL information, smacks of childish petiness and the ego and maturity of a 5 year old on the part of the individual who did it. Just because we collect a toy line marketted to 5 year olds doesn't mean that people on here have to act like them! --Bowspearer 05:46, 21 January 2010 (AEDST)

Uh. Nobody at all touched Breakdown's IDW section outside of regular contributors. Nobody deleted any page revisions and there haven't been any database crashes since the Bookworm Crash, which happened before the Ongoing was announced. Are you certain you didn't add it to Wikipedia or the Wikia site? --Detour 13:55, 20 January 2010 (EST)