Talk:Henry Lanson

These articles really don't have much in the way of content, and I doubt ever will. Wouldn't it make more sense to include them all into a "Magnificent Seven" article? We could still have all the individual names as redirects, but I don't see any article here actually linking to an individual rather than the group as a whole. --Bluestreak7 12:49, 10 February 2010 (EST)

Good idea.--Jimsorenson 12:54, 10 February 2010 (EST)

I disagree with you with every fiber of my being. —Interrobang 13:29, 10 February 2010 (EST)

Great. Well put. A cogent argument, all around.

There is literally no information on this article that isn't already on the Ark II site. Nor for any of the other Magnificent Seven except for Sparkplug. They're the same article again and again and again, with only the first sentence different. That first sentence is what we've already seen. This article has no value at all. The Related Characters template is perfect for this. Individual names can and should be redirects. --Jimsorenson 13:59, 10 February 2010 (EST)

When you get down to it, Wikis are essentially duplicated information packed into different configurations. This article just doesn't meet your arbitrary standard of uniqueness. I'd prefer this Wiki not fall into the pit of "X doesn't deserve an article because I think so". —Interrobang 14:17, 10 February 2010 (EST)

I'm with Sorenson here, myself. I'm always in favor of anything that consolidates articles that will never have more than near-useless one-liner and/or duplicated information into something more substantial and useful. It makes both editing and reading much easier. --Jeysie 14:27, 10 February 2010 (EST)