Category talk:Subgroups
I've had this discussion in IRC, and I'm gonna have it here... basically, I feel that we might be overdoing the Categories in regards to Subgroups.
I don't think it's neccessary to make a Category for all of three entries (like, say, the Triggerbots) or for single-series combiner teams (like Dinoforce), espeically since those groups will have a page of their own as well that ought to list the members. It seems a bit redundant for such a small thing. I mean, once we put up ARTICLES for Throttlebots and Triggerbots et all, would not THOSE fall under "Subgroups" and still show up in the Subgroups Category page? The function is served.
Transmetals, Pretenders, Fuzors, Head/Target/Power/Action Masters, those are all pretty broad groups (especially once you take into account Nebulans and other "partner" characters). And some groups/teams/factions that are cross-series, like Dinobots and Constructicons and Aerialbots and Predacons, beautiful, put those up as Categories. But, well... Throttlebots? I don't think that's really Category-worthy. --M Sipher 05:51, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
