Talk:Erector (G1)

I have a idea - given the obviousness (and lameness) of the jokes that will eventually appear in this article, I propose that this article will be written entirely 'straight', that is, taken seriously without any jokes. That, in fact, will be the joke - people expect bad jokes from this wiki, so we buck the trend. --FFN 06:28, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

What a flaccid page this shall be! -ItsWalky 06:41, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

That's the joke :D People expect chock-a-block of viagra or erectile dysfunction or other dick-related jokes from this page, so we go in a completely opposite direction and do nothing. It's edgy! It's left-of-field humour! --FFN 06:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Or we could fill the entire article with sophmoric sexual humor...but exercise a complete ban on anything that's even vaguely about erections, just to confuse people. -Derik 07:20, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Lilformers has a better joke than the crap you get about erections. Why not just say something about his name? One little Micro-Master didn't QUITE make it to name day on time... 86.17.124.125 14:57, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Editing the humorous captions is a privilege accorded to editors who have made notable contributions to the wiki. Looking over your contribution history, you're not there yet. I recommend you get an account and find a substantive way to contribute, before editing the humor. JW 15:09, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

For what it's worth, I've got a Wikipedia account which I use for minor edits. And I just moved that username into Teletraan. And there's no reason to accuse me of being like Megatron. I'm smarter than him. Harley Quinn hyenaholic 15:22, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Excellent, thank you for getting an account. Now, please stop editing captions until you've made some substantial contributions. Thank you. JW 15:32, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

An Idea

I've written an alternative version of this at User:-Blackout-/Erector. Read and discuss, please.

(Before anyone asks: yes, we can take out the Wikipedia-style captions.) ---Blackout- 12:44, 6 March 2010 (EST)

Much better. - Starfield 12:52, 6 March 2010 (EST)

Any chance of feedback from other people? I won't mind if you blow the idea to hell, really. :) ---Blackout- 15:33, 19 March 2010 (EDT)

I actually like the snickering about his name in the current article, sorry. Also, your word choice in the above comment is somewhat unfortunate. Khajidha 15:46, 19 March 2010 (EDT)

What? How? Impossible! Surely it isn't! [endsarcasm]

(I hate being a non-native English speaker.) ---Blackout- 16:24, 19 March 2010 (EDT)

I don't get that page. The differences are mainly the removal of the "(*snort*)","(*giggle*)" and such. So, what's that supposed to be, anyway? Is there some point I'm missing?

Item42 02:21, 15 June 2010 (EDT)

Hall of Fame

Thought the consensus was HoF bios are in the New Aligned continuity?--76.28.76.206 13:25, 13 April 2011 (EDT)