File talk:Chevrolet-rotf gdatm-ads.jpg
From MediaWiki
Those are the tightest briefs. I checked. --ItsWalky 23:30, 12 June 2011 (EDT)
- For reference (in case someone's worried) the pic is for a sandbox draft on homosexuality.
- (I don't particularly think the wiki's ever gonna make the page live, but it's worth pecking at.)
- If anyone wants to make a page for the Chevy Gay Day at the Movies:ROTF promotion, by all means, go ahead! -Derik 23:33, 12 June 2011 (EDT)
- As this appears to be a Chevy only thing and not a Hasbro thing, I'm disinclined to say it should get a page. --M Sipher 23:34, 12 June 2011 (EDT)
- >implying homosexuality is a Chevy thing
- Anyway, the ads were allowed to use Hasbro trademarks such as the Autobot symbol, so it apparently falls under their partnership with Hasbro. -Derik 23:39, 12 June 2011 (EDT)
- Which explains the complete and utter lack of any Hasbro trademark information on the ad, plus the fact that none of the cars are referred to by their character names. --M Sipher 23:50, 12 June 2011 (EDT)
- But using Hasbro trademarks without permission would be improper! Are you suggesting Chevrolet broke the law? -Derik 00:05, 13 June 2011 (EDT)
- Which explains the complete and utter lack of any Hasbro trademark information on the ad, plus the fact that none of the cars are referred to by their character names. --M Sipher 23:50, 12 June 2011 (EDT)
- As this appears to be a Chevy only thing and not a Hasbro thing, I'm disinclined to say it should get a page. --M Sipher 23:34, 12 June 2011 (EDT)
Also— if anyone knows where to find a video of the commercial I'd... appreciate it. (Apparently you can see the Bumblebee Transformers mask and sign for the promotion in some shots.) -Derik 23:35, 12 June 2011 (EDT)
Deletion
I'm sorry, this didn't appear to have undergone any formal deletion discussion. (in fact I don't recall any suggestion that it should be deleted at all.)
Could I be provided an official justification for this action? The sandbox page in the User namespace it was destined for looks awfully strange without it. -Derik 00:18, 13 June 2011 (EDT)
- May I also add-- Colleen Porch if it may be relevant to the answer? -Derik 00:21, 13 June 2011 (EDT)

