Talk:Jem
Given Detour's and anon's latest additions to this page, I need to ask something what we have to do with this page in relation to TF fiction and the Jem franchise. Currently, this page is about the in-fiction fiction (or in-fiction reality? What's to say Jem the sign isn't an advert for an in-fiction real person?). What about the franchise Jem? There's about four arguments (Ramirez, AA2, models in "B.O.T.", SG Misfits) for a page about the franchise to be created, but I wouldn't know if that information should be incorporated in this article or made into a separate page. Geewunling 02:09, 29 July 2011 (EDT)
- Going by the precedent of the Doctor and such, the Notes section is where it'd be at, no? --Detour 02:11, 29 July 2011 (EDT)
- Actually, I think Doctor Who deserves an own page as well, as the Doctor article does not cover a number of Doctor Who references in TF fiction and isn't suited for those either (the line from "Rebirth" about reversing polarities, some stuff from the TAAs, the Dalek altmode of Octus, etc.). Geewunling 02:18, 29 July 2011 (EDT)
- Octus's altmode is covered in the Dalek article. --Detour 02:20, 29 July 2011 (EDT)
- Leo Spitz mentions Doctor Who on TheRealEffingDeal.com, but I don't know if mentions of things on that blog count as canon for the purposes of this wiki. I mean, he links to a lot of random non-TF related stuff on there. --abates 03:03, 29 July 2011 (EDT)
- Actually, I think Doctor Who deserves an own page as well, as the Doctor article does not cover a number of Doctor Who references in TF fiction and isn't suited for those either (the line from "Rebirth" about reversing polarities, some stuff from the TAAs, the Dalek altmode of Octus, etc.). Geewunling 02:18, 29 July 2011 (EDT)
That's really a Jem cameo in a Japanese Transformers cartoon? How'd it get there? Is it from the same animation studio? - Starfield 11:31, 29 July 2011 (EDT)
