Talk:Personal canon

From MediaWiki
Revision as of 03:03, 20 October 2013 by SoundWave (talk | contribs) (Undo revision 832554 by ItsWalky (Talk))
Jump to navigationJump to search
I am so disappointed that no Transformer has an 'anti-personnel cannon' we can disambig this with. Missiles, mines, shredders-- but no anti-personnel cannons.
So sad. -Derik 07:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

This article is soo not-condescending enough, it totally breaks the theme all our other fandom articles have, and whats worse is that personal cannon is more deserving of ridicule

Except that there is nothing inherently wrong or bad about personal canon as a concept. Just because some people have ridiculous personal canons doesn't mean EVERY personal canon is. Oscar Wilde is dead, but not all dead people are Oscar Wilde.
The problem becomes when people substitute personal canon for actual canon in arguments, discussions and informative articles. --M Sipher 01:40, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Also, *every fan* has a personal canon. It is impossible to avoid. One cannot consume any story without constructing an internal mental representation of what happened, what things mean, etc.. --Steve-o 14:14, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Is that you, X-Bob? --ItsWalky 15:30, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Can I add "Bayformers never existed" to the list? And why did this get reverted? - SoundWave 22:30, 19 October 2013 (EDT)