Talk:Scavenger (Universe 2008)

Page move

Considering that we have Scavenger (Universe Ultra) and Scavenger (Universe Micromaster), shouldn't this page have remained at Scavenger (Universe 2008)? --Khajidha (talk) 10:29, 22 August 2014 (EDT)

No, because that's an inconsistent disambig (unless you wanted to move the others to (Universe 2003 Whatever). I take your point though, which is why I moved this to (Universe Mini-Con) - I was looking for pages that had (Universe 2003) and/or (Universe 2008), but no (Universe) pointing to (disambiguation)! - SanityOrMadness (talk) 13:04, 22 August 2014 (EDT)

....But it's not part of the same Universe toyline as the other two. Escargon (talk) 13:06, 22 August 2014 (EDT)

Well, if you want to move every single (Universe) to (Universe 2003) or (Universe 2008) [or (Universe 2003 Whatever)/(Universe 2008 Whatever)], be my guest. - SanityOrMadness (talk) 13:26, 22 August 2014 (EDT)

The way I understand it is: Universe if the name is only used in one of the two Universe franchises, then Universe 2003/2008 if there is no duplication within that franchise, and further description for duplication within one of the Universes. Universe Ultra, Universe Micromaster, and Universe 2008 may not be consistent with each other, but they are consistent with this guideline. Personally, I think we SHOULD specify the year for all Universe disambigs, but consensus has always been against me. --Khajidha (talk) 13:35, 22 August 2014 (EDT)

Well, that's nominally arguing for (Universe 2003 Ultra) and (Universe 2003 Micromaster).

Personally though, I'm absolutely with you on that last sentence... - SanityOrMadness (talk) 13:45, 22 August 2014 (EDT)

I am in favor of those if we decide to use years on all Universe disambigs, but by current rules the names should be Universe Ultra, Universe Micromaster, and Universe 2008 as they were before you changes. --Khajidha (talk) 13:49, 22 August 2014 (EDT)