Talk:Brisko
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
IDW Brisko
[edit]Is IDW Brisko not a separate character in the same way Zetca (G1) is? They're both G1 so we'd need another disamig like "Nebulan" and "Decepticon" maybe. --Emvee (talk) 08:59, 10 February 2015 (EST)
- I agree. S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 14:10, 25 May 2015 (EDT)
- Wait, whoa, I am not convinced - neither about these splits, nor with Zetca being separate, either. What's the benefit, for starters? -- Repowers (talk) 21:50, 27 May 2015 (EDT)
- See Talk:Zetca. S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 22:52, 27 May 2015 (EDT)
- Yeah, I never agreed with that in the first place; creating an imaginary distinction in the character just cause they're a different species is another one of those "over-complicating" things-especially when in canon Nebulans have been fully mechanical before. Escargon (talk) 23:01, 27 May 2015 (EDT)
- Seconded. I think we're over thinking this. Someone with the same name and visuals be split up because of species.--Jimsorenson (talk) 23:04, 27 May 2015 (EDT)
- Yeah, I never agreed with that in the first place; creating an imaginary distinction in the character just cause they're a different species is another one of those "over-complicating" things-especially when in canon Nebulans have been fully mechanical before. Escargon (talk) 23:01, 27 May 2015 (EDT)
- See Talk:Zetca. S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 22:52, 27 May 2015 (EDT)
- Wait, whoa, I am not convinced - neither about these splits, nor with Zetca being separate, either. What's the benefit, for starters? -- Repowers (talk) 21:50, 27 May 2015 (EDT)