Talk:Infinite Combinatoric

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

This is mentioned as one of the artifacts of the Thirteen, but that's it as far as I've seen. Should this just be a redirect to the Thirteen?192.249.47.196 11:49, 17 October 2011 (EDT)

No. It doesn't matter how little we know of it. It still warrants an article. —Interrobang 11:59, 17 October 2011 (EDT)
And if it isn't a red link on a page, nobody will realize it needs an article. Redirecting obscures articles that need creation. --ItsWalky 12:11, 17 October 2011 (EDT)
I guess I was thinking about some list on the Thirteen page covering their relics...but no matter! I've created the page based on Star Saber (Prima), hopefully it's good enough that it doesn't get immediately deleted. Thanks for answering my question so quickly, guys.192.249.47.196 12:33, 17 October 2011 (EDT)
There should be a list somewhere, yes. I think somebody suggested an "artifacts of the Thirteen" article. Your article is good, though. —Interrobang 12:50, 17 October 2011 (EDT)

Do I have to be the one to point out that this is probably the Spark of Combination? -Derik 18:19, 3 November 2011 (EDT)

But, there was no singular artifact called the Spark of Combination, was there? Optimus handed out a bunch of them to his team. --KilMichaelMcC 18:32, 3 November 2011 (EDT)
I believe the terminology used indicated he "had" it, but Energon is incoherent, so.
(No, wait... did Jetfire popped a SOC out to Inferno when they first combined or something?)
Whatever, it always seemed to be Optimus handing 'em out. So... 'root' SOC? The concept implied by the terminology just fits really nice; that which enables anything to spontaneously combine with anything else. -Derik 18:56, 3 November 2011 (EDT)
  • it is confirmed that the infinite Combinatoric and the enigma of combination are one and the same as of Ask Vector Prime (with one reviewer commented its a case of 'Tomato/Tomahto, then.' so suggest we merge the pages together. --Projectus (talk) 15:00, 16 July 2015 (EDT)
Not necessarily the case, since most of those deities are not connected (or if so, only in the most strained of ways). At best I'd say this is ambiguous.--Tindalos (talk) 19:19, 16 July 2015 (EDT)
I interpreted it as "same sort of function, different entities" since most of them seem to be the most important dudes in there religion. Escargon (talk) 19:22, 16 July 2015 (EDT)