Talk:Micro-bug
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
If this is an excess to have this article, then remove it, it's fine. It's just the fact that it played a prominent role in the episode and it got a name call-out that makes me think it should have it's own article. TheMZone 20:40, 9 November 2010 (EST)
- It should have a page... but said page needs to be properly formatted. Intro blurb, fiction section, categories, that little thing in italics that indicates what it is and which continuity it's from, etc. --Detour 20:49, 9 November 2010 (EST)
- Thank you for clarifying. I was under the impression that smaller articles, like turbofox or dynametal duck, don't need formatting. Now are they the exception, or in need of cleanup? TheMZone 00:31, 10 November 2010 (EST)
- I'd say cleanup... --Detour 00:43, 10 November 2010 (EST)
- Also Megatron calls it a "micro-bug". --abates 00:52, 10 November 2010 (EST)
- Thanks for the help and cleanup! I thought I heard Megs call it a Robo-bug, but I might have hearing problems. TheMZone
- I think there was a sound effect partially over that line which wouldn't help (and frankly robo-bug would have made more sense, since the thing is not very micro) --abates 16:15, 10 November 2010 (EST)
- Thanks for the help and cleanup! I thought I heard Megs call it a Robo-bug, but I might have hearing problems. TheMZone
- Also Megatron calls it a "micro-bug". --abates 00:52, 10 November 2010 (EST)
- I'd say cleanup... --Detour 00:43, 10 November 2010 (EST)
- Thank you for clarifying. I was under the impression that smaller articles, like turbofox or dynametal duck, don't need formatting. Now are they the exception, or in need of cleanup? TheMZone 00:31, 10 November 2010 (EST)

