Talk:Rapid Run (Energon)

On his cardback, Rapidrun is identified as a Decepticon. I forget- was Sideways ID'd by a half-and-half symbol?

Also- was there a consensus on which one was Nightscream and which one was Nightcruz? (I recal there beign packaging/function/instruction madness on this)

Also-also- as there is no character art for Nightscream and Nightcruz, would it be disingenuous to recolor Rook and Crosswise's art? (Rapid Run's art was just Sideways's recolored and flipped on his package.) -Derik 11:28, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Sideways had the same half-and-half symbol he has in Cybertron. Nightscream was identified as the Rook mold and a Decepticon on the cardback; Nightcruz was identified as the Crosswise mold and an Autobot. Like the "corrected" Sideways, the Rook mold revealed the Autobot symbol and the Crosswise mold revealed the Decepticon symbol. I do not think this is necessarily an error; if the Mini-Cons he comes with are actually aligned, then it makes sense that they would allow Rapid Run to disguise himself as the enemy faction.

I think we are avoiding any unlicensed art. -LV 15:43, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Would it be fair to assuem that Energon Nightscream is the same character as Armada Nightscream? Nightscream's the one who vowed to find some way to bring hsi aprtner back from Unicron. 10 ywars later- and suddenly there' a Nightscream bopping aroudn with a likely candidate for a Unicronian agent. (Boring as I find that for Rapid Run, it's at least SOME form of characerization.) -Derik 11:34, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Well, I'm gonna have to say no, I don't think it's fair to assume the two Nightscreams are the same guy. --KilMichaelMcC 12:12, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

I agre with Kil. --ItsWalky 15:32, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

My heart protesteth, but my head agrees. -Derik 00:28, 22 May 2006 (UTC)